Sometimes the children who challenge us the most are the ones who are asking the loudest to be understood. In early childhood education, it’s easy to label behaviour as difficult, but far harder and far more important to look beneath it.
The phone rang one quiet afternoon and on the line was a mum looking for a position in our service for her little boy, her voice a mix of hope and exhaustion. Her son had been expelled from another service for his ‘behaviour’. You could hear the ache in her words, the kind that only comes from being misunderstood too many times.
When he first walked through our doors, it was clear he didn’t need to be ‘fixed’. There was no defiance to tame, no brokenness to mend, just a child doing his best to be heard in the only way he knew how. What he truly needed was connection, patience, and adults willing to listen to the message behind the behaviour. The journey wasn’t always easy, but from the beginning we’d already won half the battle because this little boy had parents who stood beside us, not opposite us. They weren’t seeking excuses or pity; they wanted understanding, collaboration, and a place where their son could finally belong.
Once he had found safety, trust, and genuine attunement, the change unfolded quietly. There was no dramatic turnaround, no single defining moment, just a gradual softening, a settling. What emerged was something deeply human: a child who felt seen, and a community that chose to understand before it judged because it knew that every stomp, every glare, every collapse into tears wasn’t rebellion, it was communication. It was this child’s way of saying to us “ I don’t have the words, can you listen to what I need another way?”.
Challenging the Normal: Authoritarian vs. Relational Practice.
Moment of challenging behaviour aren’t interruptions to learning they ARE learning. This type of behaviour is a neon flashing sign that can show you if a child is full of fear, frustration, exhaustion, hunger, overstimulation, loneliness, and most importantly, an aching need for connection. Challenging behaviour is not a child trying to push us away, it’s a child asking you to sit alongside them in their feelings.
For generations, Early Childhood Education has been an authoritarian model of ‘behaviour management’ that was built on control. It was neat and predictable. Adults commanded and children complied. The good children were the ones who sat still, back straight, hands in laps, eyes forward and mouths closed. The bad children were managed, punished, or sent away until they could fit the mould of what good looked like.
Authoritarian approaches are rooted in the belief that respect must be earned through fear because children must be controlled before they can be taught. But neuroscience, trauma-informed practice, and plain human experience tell a different story. The relational approach, or what you may know as behaviour guidance flips that narrative on its head. It says that respect is modelled and not to be demanded. Where authoritarianism says, “Because I’m the teacher and I said so”relational pedagogy says, “I’m going to stay with you while we figure this out together”. Relational practice shifts from power over children to power with children and in doing so, we become the kind of adults who teach not just with rules, but with relationship.
The Story Behind Behaviour.
As Starr Commonwealth (2024) observes in their trauma-informed framework, behaviour can be understood as the language of unmet needs. Before children can name emotions, their bodies do the talking. Defiance, avoidance, giggles in serious moments, all of it is communication in motion.
So maybe that child who refuses to clean up isn’t being difficult, even when you play the catchiest of pack away songs. Maybe that child is saying to you “I don’t want this moment to end because it’s the only place I feel in control.” Perhaps the child who laughs when someone gets hurt isn’t cold and maybe their laughter is their shield, protecting them from emotions too big to name.
When we are busy assuming that there is something wrong with a child showing challenging behaviour we’re missing the only question that matters: “What’s happening for this child?”
Here’s the hard truth: correcting behaviour often serves the adult more than the child. It restores our sense of order. It makes us feel calm, however, when we shift the focus from correction to connection, everything changes.
Connection says, “I see you. You matter, even when you’re messy.”
Correction alone says, “I’ll see you when you get it right.”
The research is clear. ACECQA (2025) and CELA (2024) both point out that ‘behaviour management’, that old language of compliance, is outdated. Children don’t need managing; they need guiding. They need adults who can meet them with empathy, coregulation, and consistency.
Connection isn’t soft, it’s neuroscience in action
It sounds gentle, maybe even naive. But it’s not soft it’s science.
When a child is flooded with emotion, their brain’s simply can’t process rational thought, logic or reasoning. The prefrontal cortex the reasoning part of the brain shuts down, leaving the limbic system in charge. That’s fight, flight, freeze. Ask yourself, would you be able to control your emotions in that state? As Kim Golding (2023) explains, connection is the prerequisite to correction. It’s only when a child feels safe that their thinking brain switches back on. That’s when learning can begin. Connection doesn’t mean permissiveness. It’s not “anything goes.” It’s calm but fair.
It sounds like:
“I can see you’re angry. I’m here with you. Let’s figure this out together.”
Not:
“Stop it right now or you’re missing out.”
One opens a door. The other closes it.
Less control. More connection. Where empathy leads, regulation follows.
In practice, ‘connect before you correct’ looks and feels different from the traditional image of behaviour management. It starts with the educator’s presence calm, grounded, and attuned. When a child’s emotions spill over, instead of rushing in with consequences or commands, the educator pauses, breathes, and approaches with curiosity rather than control. They get down to the child’s level, soften their tone, and make eye contact. The first response can’t be to tell a child to stop or settle down but should be “I can see that you are upset, what is happening?”. This shift instantly changes the dynamic. The child feels seen, not shamed. The educator becomes a partner in problem solving, not an enforcer of rules.
Practically, it means creating environments where emotional expression is not punished but guided. It means educators model emotional literacy by naming feelings “You’re feeling angry because the tower fell down”. Boundaries still exist, but they’re held with warmth and clarity: “I won’t let you hurt others, but I’ll stay with you while you calm down.” It’s also about slowing down transitions, noticing triggers, and seeing challenging moments as opportunities to teach regulation rather than demand compliance.
In practice, it sounds like gentle conversations after a hard moment, not quick labels or blame. It’s not, “He’s being difficult again,” but “What might he be trying to tell us?”. It’s educators being patient and consistent with their approaches and leaning on each other, sharing what worked, holding space for what didn’t. Over time, this steadiness becomes safety. Children begin to trust that mistakes won’t make love disappear that connection is still waiting for them on the other side of the storm. And slowly, the noise shifts: chaos softens into understanding, correction turns into collaboration.
Fear may control children for a moment. Connection teaches them for life
You’ll hear it sometimes: Kids these days are too soft. But let’s be honest fear may create obedience, but it never creates empathy. Children who only behave when they’re afraid haven’t learned self regulation; they’ve learned to hide. Connection doesn’t raise “snowflakes.” It raises humans who can sit with big feelings and still choose kindness.
Behaviour isn’t the problem. It’s the message. And if we keep punishing the messenger, we’ll never hear the story.
And that’s how our world, children’s lives and learning environments begin to change.

Reference List
ACECQA. (2025). The Guide to the National Quality Framework (NQF): Supporting children’s behaviour and wellbeing. Australian Children’s Education and Care Quality Authority. https://www.acecqa.gov.au/
CELA. (2024). Behaviour guidance: Moving beyond management to connection.Community Early Learning Australia. https://www.cela.org.au/
Golding, K. (2023). Connection before correction: Supporting children through relationships and attunement. In K. Golding, Nurturing attachments: Supporting children who are fostered or adopted (3rd ed.). Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Starr Commonwealth. (2024). Trauma-informed, resilience-focused framework: Understanding behaviour as communication. Starr Commonwealth. https://starr.org/
Leave a comment